Fish Speechvsgluetun
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fish Speech | gluetun | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #5 of 56 in VPN |
| GitHub stars | 33 464 | 15 916 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +141 | +305 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 8 |
| Latest release | — | v3.41.3 · 30 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
gluetun scores 75/100 against 73/100 for Fish Speech, so it is the safer default.
gluetun ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.
If you want the quickest setup, gluetun is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
gluetun is growing faster right now (+305 stars in 30 days).
Fish Speech details →gluetun details →
Swap a project
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with
Keep gluetun, compare it with