Fish SpeechvsGiraffile
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fish Speech | Giraffile | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #62 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 33 473 | 187 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +150 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 |
| Latest release | — | versions · 19 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 45/100 for Giraffile, so it is the safer default.
Giraffile ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.
If you want the quickest setup, Giraffile is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+150 stars in 30 days).
Fish Speech details →Giraffile details →
Swap a project
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with
Keep Giraffile, compare it with