# firecrawl vs Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | firecrawl | Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 ✓ | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 16 in Web Scraping | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 196 379 ✓ | 16 060 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +12 486 ✓ | +245 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 31 ✓ |
| Latest release | apps/go-sdk/v1.15.0 · 8 Sept 2026 | w2026-10-23 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

firecrawl scores 91/100 against 80/100 for Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP), so it is the safer default.

Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for firecrawl.

If you want the quickest setup, Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is easier to run; firecrawl needs more configuration.

firecrawl is growing faster right now (+12 486 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [firecrawl](https://selfhost.directory/project/firecrawl) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/firecrawl.md)
- [Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)](https://selfhost.directory/project/zed-attack-proxy-zap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zed-attack-proxy-zap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/firecrawl-vs-zed-attack-proxy-zap