# firecrawl vs ytdlp_web_player

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | firecrawl | ytdlp_web_player |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 16 in Web Scraping | #12 of 36 in Video Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 196 570 ✓ | 809 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +12 227 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 ✓ | 8 |
| Latest release | apps/go-sdk/v1.15.0 · 8 Sept 2026 | v1.3.3 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

firecrawl scores 91/100 against 55/100 for ytdlp_web_player, so it is the safer default.

firecrawl ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for ytdlp_web_player.

If you want the quickest setup, ytdlp_web_player is easier to run; firecrawl needs more configuration.

firecrawl is growing faster right now (+12 227 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [firecrawl](https://selfhost.directory/project/firecrawl) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/firecrawl.md)
- [ytdlp_web_player](https://selfhost.directory/project/ytdlpwebplayer) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ytdlpwebplayer.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/firecrawl-vs-ytdlpwebplayer