# firecrawl vs Yarr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | firecrawl | Yarr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 16 in Web Scraping | #7 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 196 687 ✓ | 4 080 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +12 344 ✓ | +28 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 ✓ | 4 |
| Latest release | apps/go-sdk/v1.15.0 · 8 Sept 2026 ✓ | v2.9 · 7 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

firecrawl scores 91/100 against 61/100 for Yarr, so it is the safer default.

firecrawl ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Yarr.

If you want the quickest setup, Yarr is easier to run; firecrawl needs more configuration.

firecrawl is growing faster right now (+12 344 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [firecrawl](https://selfhost.directory/project/firecrawl) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/firecrawl.md)
- [Yarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/yarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/yarr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/firecrawl-vs-yarr