# firecrawl vs Xibo CMS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | firecrawl | Xibo CMS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 16 in Web Scraping | #2 of 7 in Digital Signage |
| GitHub stars | 196 570 ✓ | 517 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +12 227 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 ✓ | 7 |
| Latest release | apps/go-sdk/v1.15.0 · 8 Sept 2026 | 4.5.5 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

firecrawl scores 91/100 against 59/100 for Xibo CMS, so it is the safer default.

firecrawl ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Xibo CMS.

If you want the quickest setup, Xibo CMS is easier to run; firecrawl needs more configuration.

firecrawl is growing faster right now (+12 227 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [firecrawl](https://selfhost.directory/project/firecrawl) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/firecrawl.md)
- [Xibo CMS](https://selfhost.directory/project/xibo-cms) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/xibo-cms.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/firecrawl-vs-xibo-cms