firecrawlvswraft
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| firecrawl | wraft | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 16 in Web Scraping | #35 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 196 430 | 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +12 537 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 3 |
| Latest release | apps/go-sdk/v1.15.0 · 8 Sept 2026 | v0.6.7 · 25 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Elixir |
Which one should you pick?
firecrawl scores 91/100 against 44/100 for wraft, so it is the safer default.
firecrawl ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for wraft.
firecrawl is growing faster right now (+12 537 stars in 30 days).
firecrawl details →wraft details →
Swap a project
Keep firecrawl, compare it with
Keep wraft, compare it with