# firecrawl vs Workout.cool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | firecrawl | Workout.cool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 ✓ | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 16 in Web Scraping | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 196 406 ✓ | 8 651 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +12 513 ✓ | +156 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | apps/go-sdk/v1.15.0 · 8 Sept 2026 ✓ | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

firecrawl scores 91/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.

firecrawl ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.

If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; firecrawl needs more configuration.

firecrawl is growing faster right now (+12 513 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [firecrawl](https://selfhost.directory/project/firecrawl) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/firecrawl.md)
- [Workout.cool](https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/firecrawl-vs-workout-cool