# firecrawl vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | firecrawl | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 16 in Web Scraping | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 196 350 ✓ | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +12 457 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | apps/go-sdk/v1.15.0 · 8 Sept 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

firecrawl scores 91/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.

Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for firecrawl.

firecrawl is growing faster right now (+12 457 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [firecrawl](https://selfhost.directory/project/firecrawl) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/firecrawl.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/firecrawl-vs-windows-arm