firecrawlvsWakapi
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| firecrawl | Wakapi | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 16 in Web Scraping | #4 of 11 in Time Tracking |
| GitHub stars | 196 483 | 4 466 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +12 140 | +31 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 11 |
| Latest release | apps/go-sdk/v1.15.0 · 8 Sept 2026 | 2.18.2 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
firecrawl scores 91/100 against 64/100 for Wakapi, so it is the safer default.
Wakapi ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for firecrawl.
If you want the quickest setup, Wakapi is easier to run; firecrawl needs more configuration.
firecrawl is growing faster right now (+12 140 stars in 30 days).
firecrawl details →Wakapi details →
Swap a project
Keep firecrawl, compare it with
Keep Wakapi, compare it with