# firecrawl vs url-to-png

> Two self-hosted [Web Scraping projects](https://selfhost.directory/web-scraping), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | firecrawl | url-to-png |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 16 in Web Scraping | #13 of 16 in Web Scraping |
| GitHub stars | 196 315 ✓ | 256 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +12 422 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | apps/go-sdk/v1.15.0 · 8 Sept 2026 ✓ | v2.1.4 · 18 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

firecrawl scores 91/100 against 49/100 for url-to-png, so it is the safer default.

firecrawl ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for url-to-png.

If you want the quickest setup, url-to-png is easier to run; firecrawl needs more configuration.

firecrawl is growing faster right now (+12 422 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [firecrawl](https://selfhost.directory/project/firecrawl) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/firecrawl.md)
- [url-to-png](https://selfhost.directory/project/url-to-png) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/url-to-png.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/firecrawl-vs-url-to-png