# firecrawl vs unraid-config-guardian

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | firecrawl | unraid-config-guardian |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 16 in Web Scraping | #38 of 46 in Backup |
| GitHub stars | 196 642 ✓ | 171 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +12 299 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 ✓ | 8 |
| Latest release | apps/go-sdk/v1.15.0 · 8 Sept 2026 ✓ | v1.6.1 · 16 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

firecrawl scores 91/100 against 46/100 for unraid-config-guardian, so it is the safer default.

firecrawl ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for unraid-config-guardian.

If you want the quickest setup, unraid-config-guardian is easier to run; firecrawl needs more configuration.

firecrawl is growing faster right now (+12 299 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [firecrawl](https://selfhost.directory/project/firecrawl) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/firecrawl.md)
- [unraid-config-guardian](https://selfhost.directory/project/unraid-config-guardian) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unraid-config-guardian.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/firecrawl-vs-unraid-config-guardian