# firecrawl vs unopim

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | firecrawl | unopim |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 16 in Web Scraping | #1 of 6 in Product Management |
| GitHub stars | 196 642 ✓ | 11 045 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +12 299 ✓ | +46 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 17 ✓ |
| Latest release | apps/go-sdk/v1.15.0 · 8 Sept 2026 | v3.1.3 · 29 Sept 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

firecrawl scores 91/100 against 69/100 for unopim, so it is the safer default.

unopim ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for firecrawl.

If you want the quickest setup, unopim is easier to run; firecrawl needs more configuration.

firecrawl is growing faster right now (+12 299 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [firecrawl](https://selfhost.directory/project/firecrawl) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/firecrawl.md)
- [unopim](https://selfhost.directory/project/unopim) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unopim.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/firecrawl-vs-unopim