# firecrawl vs unbagrnd

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | firecrawl | unbagrnd |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 16 in Web Scraping | #10 of 13 in Image Processing |
| GitHub stars | 196 605 ✓ | 178 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +12 262 ✓ | +-1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 ✓ | 8 |
| Latest release | apps/go-sdk/v1.15.0 · 8 Sept 2026 | v0.5.6 · 14 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

firecrawl scores 91/100 against 46/100 for unbagrnd, so it is the safer default.

firecrawl ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for unbagrnd.

If you want the quickest setup, unbagrnd is easier to run; firecrawl needs more configuration.

firecrawl is growing faster right now (+12 262 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [firecrawl](https://selfhost.directory/project/firecrawl) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/firecrawl.md)
- [unbagrnd](https://selfhost.directory/project/unbagrnd) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unbagrnd.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/firecrawl-vs-unbagrnd