# firecrawl vs uMap

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | firecrawl | uMap |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 16 in Web Scraping | #3 of 9 in Mapping & GPS |
| GitHub stars | 196 379 ✓ | 1 628 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +12 486 ✓ | +25 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 12 ✓ |
| Latest release | apps/go-sdk/v1.15.0 · 8 Sept 2026 ✓ | 3.8.1 · 19 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

firecrawl scores 91/100 against 64/100 for uMap, so it is the safer default.

uMap ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for firecrawl.

If you want the quickest setup, uMap is easier to run; firecrawl needs more configuration.

firecrawl is growing faster right now (+12 486 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [firecrawl](https://selfhost.directory/project/firecrawl) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/firecrawl.md)
- [uMap](https://selfhost.directory/project/umap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/firecrawl-vs-umap