# firecrawl vs UglyFeed

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | firecrawl | UglyFeed |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 16 in Web Scraping | #52 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 196 535 ✓ | 323 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +12 192 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | apps/go-sdk/v1.15.0 · 8 Sept 2026 | v0.0.52 · 5 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

firecrawl scores 91/100 against 44/100 for UglyFeed, so it is the safer default.

firecrawl ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for UglyFeed.

If you want the quickest setup, UglyFeed is easier to run; firecrawl needs more configuration.

firecrawl is growing faster right now (+12 192 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [firecrawl](https://selfhost.directory/project/firecrawl) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/firecrawl.md)
- [UglyFeed](https://selfhost.directory/project/uglyfeed) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uglyfeed.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/firecrawl-vs-uglyfeed