# firecrawl vs TwitchDropsMiner

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | firecrawl | TwitchDropsMiner |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 16 in Web Scraping | #11 of 23 in Gaming |
| GitHub stars | 196 605 ✓ | 374 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +12 262 ✓ | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | apps/go-sdk/v1.15.0 · 8 Sept 2026 | v2.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

firecrawl scores 91/100 against 51/100 for TwitchDropsMiner, so it is the safer default.

TwitchDropsMiner ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for firecrawl.

If you want the quickest setup, TwitchDropsMiner is easier to run; firecrawl needs more configuration.

firecrawl is growing faster right now (+12 262 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [firecrawl](https://selfhost.directory/project/firecrawl) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/firecrawl.md)
- [TwitchDropsMiner](https://selfhost.directory/project/twitchdropsminer) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/twitchdropsminer.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/firecrawl-vs-twitchdropsminer