# firecrawl vs Traffic Source

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | firecrawl | Traffic Source |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 16 in Web Scraping | #10 of 27 in Analytics |
| GitHub stars | 196 509 ✓ | 679 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +12 166 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | apps/go-sdk/v1.15.0 · 8 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

firecrawl scores 91/100 against 51/100 for Traffic Source, so it is the safer default.

firecrawl ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Traffic Source.

If you want the quickest setup, Traffic Source is easier to run; firecrawl needs more configuration.

firecrawl is growing faster right now (+12 166 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [firecrawl](https://selfhost.directory/project/firecrawl) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/firecrawl.md)
- [Traffic Source](https://selfhost.directory/project/traffic-source) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/traffic-source.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/firecrawl-vs-traffic-source