firebolt-corevsWBO
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| firebolt-core | WBO | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #32 of 38 in Databases | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 256 | 2 675 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 4 |
| Latest release | v4.31.13-0.20260424104720.5698ca5339fc · 24 Apr 2026 | v2.18.26 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Shell | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
WBO scores 61/100 against 44/100 for firebolt-core, so it is the safer default.
firebolt-core ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for WBO.
If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; firebolt-core needs more configuration.
WBO is growing faster right now (+18 stars in 30 days).
firebolt-core details →WBO details →