# filestash vs Urbit

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | filestash | Urbit |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 ✓ | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 27 in File Sharing & Collaboration | #3 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 14 839 ✓ | 3 622 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +117 ✓ | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 6 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | hoon |

## Which one should you pick?

filestash scores 71/100 against 63/100 for Urbit, so it is the safer default.

Urbit ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for filestash.

If you want the quickest setup, filestash is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.

filestash is growing faster right now (+117 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [filestash](https://selfhost.directory/project/filestash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/filestash.md)
- [Urbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/filestash-vs-urbit