# filestash vs SRS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | filestash | SRS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 27 in File Sharing & Collaboration | #4 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 14 839 | 29 390 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +117 ✓ | +111 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 13 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | C |

## Which one should you pick?

SRS scores 78/100 against 71/100 for filestash, so it is the safer default.

SRS ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for filestash.

If you want the quickest setup, filestash is easier to run; SRS needs more configuration.

## Details

- [filestash](https://selfhost.directory/project/filestash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/filestash.md)
- [SRS](https://selfhost.directory/project/srs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/srs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/filestash-vs-srs