# filestash vs seedsync

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | filestash | seedsync |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 27 in File Sharing & Collaboration | #10 of 11 in File Transfer & Sync |
| GitHub stars | 14 836 ✓ | 337 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +125 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

filestash scores 70/100 against 46/100 for seedsync, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, filestash is easier to run; seedsync needs more configuration.

filestash is growing faster right now (+125 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [filestash](https://selfhost.directory/project/filestash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/filestash.md)
- [seedsync](https://selfhost.directory/project/seedsync) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/seedsync.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/filestash-vs-seedsync