# filestash vs sdnext

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | filestash | sdnext |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 27 in File Sharing & Collaboration | #3 of 11 in Image Generation |
| GitHub stars | 14 843 ✓ | 7 363 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +121 ✓ | +17 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

filestash and sdnext score the same (71/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.

If you want the quickest setup, filestash is easier to run; sdnext needs more configuration.

filestash is growing faster right now (+121 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [filestash](https://selfhost.directory/project/filestash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/filestash.md)
- [sdnext](https://selfhost.directory/project/sdnext) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sdnext.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/filestash-vs-sdnext