# filestash vs OpenReader

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | filestash | OpenReader |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 27 in File Sharing & Collaboration | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 14 835 ✓ | 550 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +124 ✓ | +35 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 18 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v5.3.0 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

filestash scores 70/100 against 59/100 for OpenReader, so it is the safer default.

OpenReader ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for filestash.

If you want the quickest setup, filestash is easier to run; OpenReader needs more configuration.

filestash is growing faster right now (+124 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [filestash](https://selfhost.directory/project/filestash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/filestash.md)
- [OpenReader](https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/filestash-vs-openreader