# filestash vs Mularr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | filestash | Mularr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 27 in File Sharing & Collaboration | #2 of 2 in P2P |
| GitHub stars | 14 836 ✓ | 179 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +125 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.0.0 · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

filestash scores 70/100 against 45/100 for Mularr, so it is the safer default.

Mularr ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for filestash.

If you want the quickest setup, filestash is easier to run; Mularr needs more configuration.

filestash is growing faster right now (+125 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [filestash](https://selfhost.directory/project/filestash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/filestash.md)
- [Mularr](https://selfhost.directory/project/mularr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mularr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/filestash-vs-mularr