# Filen WebDAV vs hadoop

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Filen WebDAV | hadoop |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 43/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 15 in File Sync | #1 of 1 in Distributed Systems |
| GitHub stars | 142 | 15 702 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +33 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

hadoop scores 76/100 against 43/100 for Filen WebDAV, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Filen WebDAV is easier to run; hadoop needs more configuration.

hadoop is growing faster right now (+33 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Filen WebDAV](https://selfhost.directory/project/filen-webdav) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/filen-webdav.md)
- [hadoop](https://selfhost.directory/project/hadoop) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hadoop.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/filen-webdav-vs-hadoop