# Fider vs temporal

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Fider | temporal |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 6 in Product Management | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 4 591 | 24 054 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +50 | +776 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v0.38.2 · 5 Oct 2026 | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

temporal scores 82/100 against 64/100 for Fider, so it is the safer default.

Fider ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for temporal.

If you want the quickest setup, Fider is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.

temporal is growing faster right now (+776 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Fider](https://selfhost.directory/project/fider) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fider.md)
- [temporal](https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fider-vs-temporal