Fidervssupabase
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fider | supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 92/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 6 in Product Management | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 4 593 | 114 286 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +52 | +3 538 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 8 |
| Latest release | v0.38.2 · 5 Oct 2026 | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 64/100 for Fider, so it is the safer default.
Fider ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for supabase.
If you want the quickest setup, Fider is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 538 stars in 30 days).
Fider details →supabase details →
Swap a project
Keep Fider, compare it with
Keep supabase, compare it with