# Feynman vs WindowsinDocker

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Feynman | WindowsinDocker |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 83/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #29 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 10 038 | 53 720 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 | +325 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v0.5.59 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

WindowsinDocker scores 83/100 against 69/100 for Feynman, so it is the safer default.

Feynman ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for WindowsinDocker.

If you want the quickest setup, Feynman is easier to run; WindowsinDocker needs more configuration.

WindowsinDocker is growing faster right now (+325 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Feynman](https://selfhost.directory/project/feynman) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/feynman.md)
- [WindowsinDocker](https://selfhost.directory/project/windowsindocker) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windowsindocker.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/feynman-vs-windowsindocker