# Feynman vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Feynman | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #29 of 209 in AI Agents | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 10 039 ✓ | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.5.60 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

Feynman scores 69/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.

Feynman ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.

If you want the quickest setup, Feynman is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

Feynman is growing faster right now (+36 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Feynman](https://selfhost.directory/project/feynman) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/feynman.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/feynman-vs-windows-arm