FeynmanvsUrbit
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Feynman | Urbit | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #29 of 209 in AI Agents | #3 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 10 039 | 3 622 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 6 |
| Latest release | v0.5.60 · 29 Oct 2026 | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | hoon |
Which one should you pick?
Feynman scores 69/100 against 63/100 for Urbit, so it is the safer default.
Feynman ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Urbit.
If you want the quickest setup, Feynman is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.
Feynman is growing faster right now (+36 stars in 30 days).
Feynman details →Urbit details →