FeynmanvsLocal Deep Research
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Feynman | Local Deep Research | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 74/100 |
| Rank in category | #29 of 209 in AI Agents | #11 of 120 in AI Assistant |
| GitHub stars | 10 035 | 9 434 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +311 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 24 |
| Latest release | v0.5.59 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.10.7 · 28 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Local Deep Research scores 74/100 against 69/100 for Feynman, so it is the safer default.
Local Deep Research ships more often: 24 stable releases in the past year, against 18 for Feynman.
If you want the quickest setup, Feynman is easier to run; Local Deep Research needs more configuration.
Local Deep Research is growing faster right now (+311 stars in 30 days).
Feynman details →Local Deep Research details →