feeds.funvsWallabag
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| feeds.fun | Wallabag | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #27 of 85 in Feed Reader | #4 of 46 in Bookmarks & Link Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 395 | 13 032 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +49 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 1 |
| Latest release | release-1.26.0 · 28 Apr 2026 | 2.6.15 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
Wallabag scores 73/100 against 50/100 for feeds.fun, so it is the safer default.
feeds.fun ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Wallabag.
If you want the quickest setup, Wallabag is easier to run; feeds.fun needs more configuration.
Wallabag is growing faster right now (+49 stars in 30 days).
feeds.fun details →Wallabag details →