# feeds.fun vs FreshRSS

> Two self-hosted [Feed Reader projects](https://selfhost.directory/feed-reader), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | feeds.fun | FreshRSS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 79/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #27 of 85 in Feed Reader | #2 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 395 | 16 438 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +312 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 9 ✓ |
| Latest release | release-1.26.0 · 28 Apr 2026 | 1.30.4 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

FreshRSS scores 79/100 against 50/100 for feeds.fun, so it is the safer default.

FreshRSS ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for feeds.fun.

If you want the quickest setup, FreshRSS is easier to run; feeds.fun needs more configuration.

FreshRSS is growing faster right now (+312 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [feeds.fun](https://selfhost.directory/project/feedsfun) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/feedsfun.md)
- [FreshRSS](https://selfhost.directory/project/freshrss) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/freshrss.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/feedsfun-vs-freshrss