# FeedHQ vs Wallabag

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | FeedHQ | Wallabag |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 43/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #57 of 85 in Feed Reader | #4 of 46 in Bookmarks & Link Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 578 | 13 033 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +50 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 2.6.15 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Python | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

Wallabag scores 73/100 against 43/100 for FeedHQ, so it is the safer default.

Wallabag ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for FeedHQ.

If you want the quickest setup, Wallabag is easier to run; FeedHQ needs more configuration.

Wallabag is growing faster right now (+50 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [FeedHQ](https://selfhost.directory/project/feedhq) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/feedhq.md)
- [Wallabag](https://selfhost.directory/project/wallabag) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wallabag.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/feedhq-vs-wallabag