# FeedHQ vs Miniflux

> Two self-hosted [Feed Reader projects](https://selfhost.directory/feed-reader), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | FeedHQ | Miniflux |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 43/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #57 of 85 in Feed Reader | #3 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 578 | 9 854 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +125 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 8 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 2.3.4 · 19 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Miniflux scores 73/100 against 43/100 for FeedHQ, so it is the safer default.

Miniflux ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for FeedHQ.

If you want the quickest setup, Miniflux is easier to run; FeedHQ needs more configuration.

Miniflux is growing faster right now (+125 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [FeedHQ](https://selfhost.directory/project/feedhq) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/feedhq.md)
- [Miniflux](https://selfhost.directory/project/miniflux) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/miniflux.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/feedhq-vs-miniflux