# FeedCraft vs Wallabag

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | FeedCraft | Wallabag |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #32 of 85 in Feed Reader | #4 of 46 in Bookmarks & Link Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 313 | 13 033 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +50 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v3.2.0 · 30 Aug 2026 | 2.6.15 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

Wallabag scores 73/100 against 49/100 for FeedCraft, so it is the safer default.

FeedCraft ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Wallabag.

Wallabag is growing faster right now (+50 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [FeedCraft](https://selfhost.directory/project/feedcraft) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/feedcraft.md)
- [Wallabag](https://selfhost.directory/project/wallabag) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wallabag.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/feedcraft-vs-wallabag