# fdm-monster vs Octoprint

> Two self-hosted [3D Printing projects](https://selfhost.directory/3d-printing), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | fdm-monster | Octoprint |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #12 of 22 in 3D Printing | #1 of 22 in 3D Printing |
| GitHub stars | 195 | 9 167 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +59 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | 2.1.1 · 14 May 2026 | 1.11.8 · 23 Jun 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Octoprint scores 73/100 against 51/100 for fdm-monster, so it is the safer default.

fdm-monster ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Octoprint.

Octoprint is growing faster right now (+59 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [fdm-monster](https://selfhost.directory/project/fdm-monster) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fdm-monster.md)
- [Octoprint](https://selfhost.directory/project/octoprint) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octoprint.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/fdm-monster-vs-octoprint