# faynoSync vs Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | faynoSync | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 64/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 20 in Application Management | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 158 | 1 725 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v2.8.0 · 14 Oct 2026 | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes scores 64/100 against 48/100 for faynoSync, so it is the safer default.

faynoSync ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes.

If you want the quickest setup, faynoSync is easier to run; Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes needs more configuration.

## Details

- [faynoSync](https://selfhost.directory/project/faynosync) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/faynosync.md)
- [Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes](https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/faynosync-vs-zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s