faynoSyncvsPostgREST
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| faynoSync | PostgREST | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 79/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 20 in Application Management | #2 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 158 | 27 733 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +55 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 20 |
| Latest release | v2.8.0 · 14 Oct 2026 | v16.5 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Haskell |
Which one should you pick?
PostgREST scores 79/100 against 48/100 for faynoSync, so it is the safer default.
faynoSync ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 20 for PostgREST.
If you want the quickest setup, PostgREST is easier to run; faynoSync needs more configuration.
PostgREST is growing faster right now (+55 stars in 30 days).
faynoSync details →PostgREST details →