# faynoSync vs Payload CMS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | faynoSync | Payload CMS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 83/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 20 in Application Management | #2 of 13 in Headless CMS |
| GitHub stars | 158 | 45 565 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +633 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 ✓ | 20 |
| Latest release | v2.8.0 · 14 Oct 2026 | v3.92.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Payload CMS scores 83/100 against 48/100 for faynoSync, so it is the safer default.

faynoSync ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 20 for Payload CMS.

Payload CMS is growing faster right now (+633 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [faynoSync](https://selfhost.directory/project/faynosync) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/faynosync.md)
- [Payload CMS](https://selfhost.directory/project/payload-cms) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/payload-cms.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Ghost vs Payload CMS](https://selfhost.directory/compare/ghost-vs-payload-cms)
- [directus vs Payload CMS](https://selfhost.directory/compare/directus-vs-payload-cms)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/faynosync-vs-payload-cms