# faynoSync vs hot-updater

> Two self-hosted [Application Management projects](https://selfhost.directory/application-management), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | faynoSync | hot-updater |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 62/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 20 in Application Management | #1 of 20 in Application Management |
| GitHub stars | 158 | 1 798 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +69 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 47 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.8.0 · 14 Oct 2026 | v1.1.4 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

hot-updater scores 62/100 against 48/100 for faynoSync, so it is the safer default.

hot-updater ships more often: 47 stable releases in the past year, against 21 for faynoSync.

If you want the quickest setup, faynoSync is easier to run; hot-updater needs more configuration.

hot-updater is growing faster right now (+69 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [faynoSync](https://selfhost.directory/project/faynosync) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/faynosync.md)
- [hot-updater](https://selfhost.directory/project/hot-updater) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hot-updater.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/faynosync-vs-hot-updater