# faynoSync vs Ghost

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | faynoSync | Ghost |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 83/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 20 in Application Management | #1 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 158 | 55 631 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +221 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 41 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.8.0 · 14 Oct 2026 | v6.73.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Ghost scores 83/100 against 48/100 for faynoSync, so it is the safer default.

Ghost ships more often: 41 stable releases in the past year, against 21 for faynoSync.

Ghost is growing faster right now (+221 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [faynoSync](https://selfhost.directory/project/faynosync) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/faynosync.md)
- [Ghost](https://selfhost.directory/project/ghost) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ghost.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Ghost vs Payload CMS](https://selfhost.directory/compare/ghost-vs-payload-cms)
- [directus vs Ghost](https://selfhost.directory/compare/directus-vs-ghost)
- [Ghost vs Wagtail](https://selfhost.directory/compare/ghost-vs-wagtail)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/faynosync-vs-ghost