# falco vs MQTTX Web

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | falco | MQTTX Web |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #12 of 78 in Security | #3 of 10 in IoT |
| GitHub stars | 9 534 ✓ | 5 086 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +124 ✓ | +22 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | 0.45.1 · 19 Oct 2026 | v1.13.2 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

falco scores 74/100 against 67/100 for MQTTX Web, so it is the safer default.

falco ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for MQTTX Web.

If you want the quickest setup, MQTTX Web is easier to run; falco needs more configuration.

falco is growing faster right now (+124 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [falco](https://selfhost.directory/project/falco) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/falco.md)
- [MQTTX Web](https://selfhost.directory/project/mqttx-web) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mqttx-web.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/falco-vs-mqttx-web