Fail2Ban-ReportvsTailscale
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fail2Ban-Report | Tailscale | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 43/100 | 84/100 |
| Rank in category | #59 of 78 in Security | #1 of 56 in VPN |
| GitHub stars | 303 | 38 252 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +1 447 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 14 |
| Latest release | — | v1.104.4 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | PHP | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Tailscale scores 84/100 against 43/100 for Fail2Ban-Report, so it is the safer default.
Tailscale ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fail2Ban-Report.
If you want the quickest setup, Tailscale is easier to run; Fail2Ban-Report needs more configuration.
Tailscale is growing faster right now (+1 447 stars in 30 days).
Fail2Ban-Report details →Tailscale details →
Swap a project
Keep Fail2Ban-Report, compare it with
Keep Tailscale, compare it with