# Faasta vs open-compute

> Two self-hosted [Serverless projects](https://selfhost.directory/serverless), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Faasta | open-compute |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 39/100 | 55/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 7 in Serverless | #3 of 7 in Serverless |
| GitHub stars | 227 | 2 365 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | build-84 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.3.0 · 10 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

open-compute scores 55/100 against 39/100 for Faasta, so it is the safer default.

Faasta ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for open-compute.

If you want the quickest setup, open-compute is easier to run; Faasta needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Faasta](https://selfhost.directory/project/faasta) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/faasta.md)
- [open-compute](https://selfhost.directory/project/open-compute) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/open-compute.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/faasta-vs-open-compute