# Faasta vs OmniVoice-Studio

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Faasta | OmniVoice-Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 39/100 | 94/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 7 in Serverless | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 227 | 92 652 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +57 711 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 35 ✓ |
| Latest release | build-84 · 20 Oct 2026 | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 39/100 for Faasta, so it is the safer default.

OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Faasta.

If you want the quickest setup, OmniVoice-Studio is easier to run; Faasta needs more configuration.

OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+57 711 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Faasta](https://selfhost.directory/project/faasta) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/faasta.md)
- [OmniVoice-Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/faasta-vs-omnivoice-studio