# faas vs OmniVoice-Studio

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | faas | OmniVoice-Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 94/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Serverless | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 26 253 | 92 515 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 | +57 574 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 35 ✓ |
| Latest release | 0.27.14 · 2 Jul 2026 | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 68/100 for faas, so it is the safer default.

OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for faas.

If you want the quickest setup, OmniVoice-Studio is easier to run; faas needs more configuration.

OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+57 574 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [faas](https://selfhost.directory/project/faas) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/faas.md)
- [OmniVoice-Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/faas-vs-omnivoice-studio