# ezbookkeeping vs Zammad

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ezbookkeeping | Zammad |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 ✓ | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 62 in Personal Finance | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 5 854 | 6 053 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +206 ✓ | +101 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.1.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

ezbookkeeping scores 71/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.

ezbookkeeping ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.

If you want the quickest setup, ezbookkeeping is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.

ezbookkeeping is growing faster right now (+206 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ezbookkeeping](https://selfhost.directory/project/ezbookkeeping) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ezbookkeeping.md)
- [Zammad](https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ezbookkeeping-vs-zammad