# ezbookkeeping vs Tube Archivist

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ezbookkeeping | Tube Archivist |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 72/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 62 in Personal Finance | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 5 862 | 8 553 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +214 ✓ | +84 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v2.1.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 71/100 for ezbookkeeping, so it is the safer default.

ezbookkeeping ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.

If you want the quickest setup, ezbookkeeping is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.

ezbookkeeping is growing faster right now (+214 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ezbookkeeping](https://selfhost.directory/project/ezbookkeeping) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ezbookkeeping.md)
- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ezbookkeeping-vs-tube-archivist